kondur_007
08-28 03:38 PM
Mine is basically a hopeless case.
EB3 India with PD Feb 2007.
My EAD, AP and II140 are all approved because of the July Fiasco and its been more than 180 days since they all got approved.
I have my EAD and AP in hand, but I140 is with employer. I neither have a copy of it, nor the receipt number/tracking for it . All I know is that it is approved. My employer will not give it to me as it is not required by law. I am still working on H1 (haven't used EAD yet)
Recently the client I am working with asked if I would be interested in a full time with them and said I can use my EAD. Is it possible for me to take up this offer without having any details about my I140 except knowing that it is approved.?
PS: I trust my employer. If they said my I140 is approved, then it is.
Safest thing to do: get a copy of I 140 approval and also copy of labor certification from USCIS via Freedom of Information act request (FOIA).
This way, you case will be clean (you need to use AC 21 and new job needs to be same or similar to the one for which you have GC filed; this requires a good attorney's help along with job titile and job description in original labor).
Good Luck.
EB3 India with PD Feb 2007.
My EAD, AP and II140 are all approved because of the July Fiasco and its been more than 180 days since they all got approved.
I have my EAD and AP in hand, but I140 is with employer. I neither have a copy of it, nor the receipt number/tracking for it . All I know is that it is approved. My employer will not give it to me as it is not required by law. I am still working on H1 (haven't used EAD yet)
Recently the client I am working with asked if I would be interested in a full time with them and said I can use my EAD. Is it possible for me to take up this offer without having any details about my I140 except knowing that it is approved.?
PS: I trust my employer. If they said my I140 is approved, then it is.
Safest thing to do: get a copy of I 140 approval and also copy of labor certification from USCIS via Freedom of Information act request (FOIA).
This way, you case will be clean (you need to use AC 21 and new job needs to be same or similar to the one for which you have GC filed; this requires a good attorney's help along with job titile and job description in original labor).
Good Luck.
wallpaper Red Hair Red Lipstick.
pune_guy
06-05 06:14 PM
Hi Guys,
In the instructions to file EAD they say to print name and alien receipt number on the back of the photos.
What number should we write? I-485 receipt number or receipt number for last EAD?
Can someone please respond?
Thanks
In the instructions to file EAD they say to print name and alien receipt number on the back of the photos.
What number should we write? I-485 receipt number or receipt number for last EAD?
Can someone please respond?
Thanks
h1techSlave
11-04 10:36 AM
Largest proportion of Tennesseans wants illegals to leave the country (43%). Another 22% says, "such individuals should be allowed to stay in their jobs, but only as temporary guest workers ineligible for U.S. citizenship".
Only 29% says "such individuals should be allowed to stay in their jobs and eventually apply for U.S. citizenship".
An interesting survey showing 51% of voters in one of America's most politically conservative states favor legalizing illegally present immigrants in one form or another:Tennesseans appear ambivalent about how best to deal with illegal immigrants currently working in the United States. The largest proportion (43 percent) says such illegal immigrants should be required to leave their jobs and leave the country. But the next largest proportion (29 percent) takes the opposite view, saying such individuals should be allowed to stay in their jobs and eventually apply for U.S. citizenship. Finally, another 22 percent say such individuals should be allowed to...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/11/most-tennessee-voters-favor-legalization-of-illegally-present-immigrants.html)
Only 29% says "such individuals should be allowed to stay in their jobs and eventually apply for U.S. citizenship".
An interesting survey showing 51% of voters in one of America's most politically conservative states favor legalizing illegally present immigrants in one form or another:Tennesseans appear ambivalent about how best to deal with illegal immigrants currently working in the United States. The largest proportion (43 percent) says such illegal immigrants should be required to leave their jobs and leave the country. But the next largest proportion (29 percent) takes the opposite view, saying such individuals should be allowed to stay in their jobs and eventually apply for U.S. citizenship. Finally, another 22 percent say such individuals should be allowed to...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/11/most-tennessee-voters-favor-legalization-of-illegally-present-immigrants.html)
2011 And what exactly is a true red
nshabana
10-02 04:25 PM
Good luck
more...
immi2006
07-02 08:55 AM
If you know sources from well known place pls quote.
No need to create rumor and panic. Sorry - no offence intended.
We are all stressed out as it is.. let us wait for official note on this.
I heard USCIS already retrogressed and rejecting Jul filer? is it true. need urgent help :mad: :mad:
No need to create rumor and panic. Sorry - no offence intended.
We are all stressed out as it is.. let us wait for official note on this.
I heard USCIS already retrogressed and rejecting Jul filer? is it true. need urgent help :mad: :mad:
madooripraveen
10-13 01:28 PM
Cut Off Dates- Consulate General of the United States Mumbai, India (http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/cut_off_dates.html)
shows different dates for EB3 India.
May be typo ????
shows different dates for EB3 India.
May be typo ????
more...
CrewNYC
09-25 01:31 PM
wow that was quick, can I see it somewhere?
Thanks!
Andrew
Thanks!
Andrew
2010 Other Obsession : Hot Red Lips
lorebarba27
07-30 04:04 AM
According to new regulations only jobs on Job Zone Five can apply for EB2???
If this is true only 15-1011.00 - Computer and Information Scientists, Research can apply under EB2 category for ITJobs.
Please advise,
If this is true only 15-1011.00 - Computer and Information Scientists, Research can apply under EB2 category for ITJobs.
Please advise,
more...
IVFOREVER
02-14 09:49 AM
Tecnically you dont have any visa number available now.since you are transfering your priority date to eb2.until they make decission on your I-140 they will not process your 485.This is my opinion only.Talk to good lawyer take the second opnion onthis before you are out of time.never know what april 08 bulletin has in store for eb3.
hair Bright, flame-red hair is best
samrat_bhargava_vihari
05-27 04:22 PM
Two weeks is normal. We filed paperbased renewal last month end and it got approved.
FYI
though it is difficult to identify the EAC/SRC no in soft copy of check.
If you can able to print the back side of check you can easily figure out the EAC/SRC no.
FYI
though it is difficult to identify the EAC/SRC no in soft copy of check.
If you can able to print the back side of check you can easily figure out the EAC/SRC no.
more...
Macaca
09-07 02:41 PM
There exist
very wise
very silent
IV members
very wise
very silent
IV members
hot When you use red lipstick and
bekugc
08-06 05:39 PM
whether you are in h1 or h4, it is important you maintain 'good standing' of whatever status you are in. if u dont have a job, change to H4, so that ur earlier h1 record remains clean (as long as u had H1, u got paid and have proof of pay /employment experience)
when you get ur offer down the line, if that company sponsors h1 for you, at that time theyll collect ur experience letters and proof and go for the H1. if the h1 sponsor is a different company, Im do not really think it is treated as a "renewal" since ur status as H1 has ended when u changed to H4. It may be treated as a "fresh h1 sponsor/transfer" for you.
However, you do not have to worry about the annual h1 quota in ur case even tho u have lost ur H1 status. you are included in the exception clause - "Those beneficiaries not subject to the annual quota are those who currently hold H-1B status or have held H-1B status at some point in the past six years and have not been outside the United States for more than 365 consecutive days"
so basically, according to me, if ur employment record is clean and if the new sponsor's requirements meets proper H1 guidelines, you can get back on H1.
im not an attorney..so the regular warning applies!
when you get ur offer down the line, if that company sponsors h1 for you, at that time theyll collect ur experience letters and proof and go for the H1. if the h1 sponsor is a different company, Im do not really think it is treated as a "renewal" since ur status as H1 has ended when u changed to H4. It may be treated as a "fresh h1 sponsor/transfer" for you.
However, you do not have to worry about the annual h1 quota in ur case even tho u have lost ur H1 status. you are included in the exception clause - "Those beneficiaries not subject to the annual quota are those who currently hold H-1B status or have held H-1B status at some point in the past six years and have not been outside the United States for more than 365 consecutive days"
so basically, according to me, if ur employment record is clean and if the new sponsor's requirements meets proper H1 guidelines, you can get back on H1.
im not an attorney..so the regular warning applies!
more...
house Gabrielle Union-Red Lipstick
ysnraju
12-17 07:30 PM
My PD also wrong. for almost last 2 months I am trying DOL through My attorney That includes so far 8 fax letters requesting the same but no results sofar
tattoo Red lipstick can be a sexy
OTTO
05-13 02:46 PM
Hi, I was hired 6 months ago as an Electrical Engineer and I am now preparing to apply for GC thru company Sponsorship. I have MS + 2 years and the position requires BS+7.
1. Am I qualified for EB2?
2. Which level do I fall under? Do you think the figures at the link below more or less right for privailing wage?
FLCDataCenter.com (http://www.flcdatacenter.com/OesQuickResults.aspx?code=17-2071&area=12100&year=11&source=1)
Thanks
Baris
1. Am I qualified for EB2?
2. Which level do I fall under? Do you think the figures at the link below more or less right for privailing wage?
FLCDataCenter.com (http://www.flcdatacenter.com/OesQuickResults.aspx?code=17-2071&area=12100&year=11&source=1)
Thanks
Baris
more...
pictures flicked the red lipstick
UNFLUX
10-04 12:35 PM
http://www.unflux.com/bb/thumbsup.gif
/unflux
:cyclops:
/unflux
:cyclops:
dresses Megan Fox makeup red lip
Anders �stberg
June 12th, 2005, 04:50 AM
Congrats! New lenses is always a thrill. Great pictures too, looks like you made good choices.
more...
makeup She has bucked the bright red
Green_Print
07-20 01:56 PM
;) Yes my friend, you can change your jobs after 6 months of filing I-485 with I-140 approved.
Can I change my job after 6 months of applying I485 with valid EAD?
I have EB2 I140 approved.
I-485 applied this July.
Thank you.
Can I change my job after 6 months of applying I485 with valid EAD?
I have EB2 I140 approved.
I-485 applied this July.
Thank you.
girlfriend red hair red lipstick war?
patchsk
12-06 11:57 AM
I got my H1b tranfer in premium processing approved in 2 days, 2 days for receipt notice.
So all process is with in 1 week. This is for Vermont center though.
So all process is with in 1 week. This is for Vermont center though.
hairstyles Blonde hair red lipstick
krishna_brc
07-02 05:43 PM
Tnks for the quick response. a couple more questions :D
1) Eligibility Status?
2)Please provide information concerning your eligibility status.
Do I need to put anything in there? Or I can just leave it blank?
I entered C (9) - Pending AOS as Eligibility Status.
1) Eligibility Status?
2)Please provide information concerning your eligibility status.
Do I need to put anything in there? Or I can just leave it blank?
I entered C (9) - Pending AOS as Eligibility Status.
kunjakka
07-13 10:26 AM
Hmm, somebody can confirm this. I am in Houston, Texas
While I e-filed my EAD renewal, everything was super-duper and the pdf files indicate that it was sent to Texas Service Center (pending I-485 is in TSC and initial EADs/APs were received from TSC). I marked in my Application that My I-485 was Emplyment Based.
I went and followed the same steps for my wife's EAD renewal(She already received EAD/AP initially in October 2007, from the TSC), who is my "dependant", but marked hers as family based I-485. I think it is because of this anamoly that, the supporting documents is being directed to National Benefits Center.
Has anybody had a similar experience? Please share
I am planning to call USCIS tomorrow. I will update you all in the details.
My main concern now is
1. I do not want to send supporting documents to two places (so that they dont get confused)
2. I do not want National Benefits Center to realize that it is the wrong service center and transfer to TSC and delay the EAD's for my wife ( whose will expire sometime in October, 2008).
3. Since her I-485 is dependant on mine, i dont want them to think that her I-485 is now family and not "my employment"
While I e-filed my EAD renewal, everything was super-duper and the pdf files indicate that it was sent to Texas Service Center (pending I-485 is in TSC and initial EADs/APs were received from TSC). I marked in my Application that My I-485 was Emplyment Based.
I went and followed the same steps for my wife's EAD renewal(She already received EAD/AP initially in October 2007, from the TSC), who is my "dependant", but marked hers as family based I-485. I think it is because of this anamoly that, the supporting documents is being directed to National Benefits Center.
Has anybody had a similar experience? Please share
I am planning to call USCIS tomorrow. I will update you all in the details.
My main concern now is
1. I do not want to send supporting documents to two places (so that they dont get confused)
2. I do not want National Benefits Center to realize that it is the wrong service center and transfer to TSC and delay the EAD's for my wife ( whose will expire sometime in October, 2008).
3. Since her I-485 is dependant on mine, i dont want them to think that her I-485 is now family and not "my employment"
Blog Feeds
11-14 04:21 AM
Dallas-Fort Worth Immigration Lawyer Has Just Posted the Following:
“If we are truly going to fix a broken system, Congress will have to act”
The following is a statement from Lynn Tramonte, Deputy Director of America’s Voice:
We have entered a new chapter and a new phase in the immigration debate. Secretary Napolitano today laid out the framework for fixing the broken immigration system, and the solution is comprehensive immigration reform. Drawing on her years of experience on the southwest border, and her new role as the nation’s top homeland security official, she said that we need Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform, and create immigration laws that truly work for our country.
Reform will secure the border, protect all workers, and require undocumented immigrants to register for legal status, pay fines and taxes, clear background checks, and get in line for citizenship. This will benefit all Americans by strengthening the rule of law, bringing in more taxpayers, cutting costs for enforcement, and making our nation’s borders stronger and safer. Now is the time for Congress to take the next step and pass legislation that would accomplish these goals.
As Secretary Napolitano pointed out, the American people support comprehensive immigration reform, and the debate we are about to engage in is not the same old debate. Law enforcement, labor, business, faith, and community leaders are all demanding comprehensive reform for our nation’s security, economy, workers, and families. We have a new President, who was elected because he promised to address important problems like this with practical solutions. We have a new Congress, with leaders who also promised change and progress to the American people.
The Secretary’s speech today was an important moment, but it was just the opening bell. It’s now time for Congress and the Administration to put serious muscle behind advancing the proposal – and it’s time for politicians of all political parties to set aside partisanship and demagoguery, and do what’s right for the country.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/proposed-immigration-laws/secretary-napolitano-makes-the-case-for-comprehensive-immigration-reform.php)
“If we are truly going to fix a broken system, Congress will have to act”
The following is a statement from Lynn Tramonte, Deputy Director of America’s Voice:
We have entered a new chapter and a new phase in the immigration debate. Secretary Napolitano today laid out the framework for fixing the broken immigration system, and the solution is comprehensive immigration reform. Drawing on her years of experience on the southwest border, and her new role as the nation’s top homeland security official, she said that we need Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform, and create immigration laws that truly work for our country.
Reform will secure the border, protect all workers, and require undocumented immigrants to register for legal status, pay fines and taxes, clear background checks, and get in line for citizenship. This will benefit all Americans by strengthening the rule of law, bringing in more taxpayers, cutting costs for enforcement, and making our nation’s borders stronger and safer. Now is the time for Congress to take the next step and pass legislation that would accomplish these goals.
As Secretary Napolitano pointed out, the American people support comprehensive immigration reform, and the debate we are about to engage in is not the same old debate. Law enforcement, labor, business, faith, and community leaders are all demanding comprehensive reform for our nation’s security, economy, workers, and families. We have a new President, who was elected because he promised to address important problems like this with practical solutions. We have a new Congress, with leaders who also promised change and progress to the American people.
The Secretary’s speech today was an important moment, but it was just the opening bell. It’s now time for Congress and the Administration to put serious muscle behind advancing the proposal – and it’s time for politicians of all political parties to set aside partisanship and demagoguery, and do what’s right for the country.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/proposed-immigration-laws/secretary-napolitano-makes-the-case-for-comprehensive-immigration-reform.php)
No comments:
Post a Comment